Screening and evaluation of sorghum germplasm for salinity tolerance using physiological indices in hydroponic culture

Authors

  • Md. Eakramul Haque On-Farm Research Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Alamnagar, Rangpur, Bangladesh
  • Md. Rishad Abdullah Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
  • Sontosh Chandra Chanda Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
  • Md. Sabibul Haque Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
  • A.K.M. Golam Sarwar Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
  • Md. Al-Amin Hossain Talukder On-Farm Research Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Alamnagar, Rangpur, Bangladesh
  • Biplob Kumar Saha Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
  • A.K.M. Zakir Hossain Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2026.110202

Keywords:

Hydroponics, Physiological indices, Sorghum, Salinity stress

Abstract

Salinity is a major abiotic stress limiting crop productivity globally, particularly in coastal and deltaic regions prone to saltwater intrusion. This study aimed to screen and evaluate eighteen Sorghum bicolor L. germplasm for salinity tolerance using physiological and biochemical indices under controlled hydroponic conditions. The experiment was conducted in a completely  randomized design with two salinity treatments (0 and 12 dS m-¹), replicated thrice, in the physiology laboratory of Bangladesh Agricultural University. Morphological (shoot/root length, leaf number), physiological (SPAD value, Fv/Fm, proline content), and biochemical traits (Na+, K+, and K+/Na+ ratio) were assessed to quantify salinity responses. Significant genotypic differences (p ≤ 0.001) were found in key indices: shoot length stress tolerance index ranged from 74.16% (BD-738) to 92.10% (BD-713), while root-shoot ratio reached a maximum of 135.34 in Safal 999. The highest K+/Na+ ratio was observed in sorghum BD-731 (10.44), whereas sorghum BD-701 showed the lowest (2.16), indicating high susceptibility. Proline accumulation increased under stress, notably in sorghum BD-713 and Hybrid Sorgo, suggesting osmotic adjustment mechanisms. Based on visual SES scoring, five genotypes (Sorghum BD-703, Sorghum BD-706, sorghum BD-713, sorghum BD-730, sorghum BD-737) were classified as tolerant, and seven as moderately tolerant. Hydroponic screening coupled with physiological indices provided a robust and reproducible method to identify salinity-tolerant sorghum lines. These findings highlight sorghum BD-703, Sorghum BD-713, Sorghum BD-706, and Hybrid Sorgo as promising candidates for further field evaluation in salt-affected environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 769–798.

Corral, S., Díaz, A. S., Monagas, M., del C., García, E. C., 2017. Agricultural Policies and Their Impact on Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries: Lessons Learned from Three Water Basins in Cape Verde. Sustainability 9 (1841), 1–18; doi:10.3390/su9101841.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2021). Agricultural transformation in Asia – Policy and institutional experiences. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/a1f1647a-6469-4e1d-9607-c3b99b6f7030/content on September 10, 2025.

Food Systems Dashboard (2025). Retrieved from https://www.foodsystemsdashboard.org/information/about-food-systems on September 10, 2025.

Gadal, N., Devkota D., Nepali P., and Devkota N. (2024). Agricultural Growth and Performance in Nepal: Assessing Trends and Signals for Policy Reforms. JOJGU 2024,1(1): 173-179.

Government of Nepal. (2015). Constitution of Nepal (2015). Nepal Law Commission, Kathmandu.

Government of Nepal. (2016). Prime Minister Agriculture Modernization Project: Program guidelines.

Government of Nepal. (2018). Right to Food and Food Sovereignty Act, 2075. Nepal Law Commission, Kathmandu.

Government of Nepal. (2015). Agriculture Development Strategy (2015-2035). Part 1 and Part 2, Singhadarbar, Kathmandu, Nepal. Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development, Government of Nepal.

Government of Nepal. (1995). Nepal Agriculture Perspective Plan (1995/96-2014/15). Agriculture Project Services Centre Kathmandu and John Mellor Associates, Inc. Washington, D.C.

Government of Nepal (2018). Consumer Protection Act. Nepal Law Commission, Kathmandu.

Government of Nepal (1998). Seed Act. Nepal Law Commission, Kathmandu.

Government of Nepal (1997). Seed Regulation. Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development (MoALD).

Government of Nepal (2013). National Seed Vision (2013 to 2025). Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development (MoALD).

Government of Nepal (1991). Pesticides Act. Nepal Law Commission, Kathmandu.

Government of Nepal. (2022). National Sample Census of Agriculture 2021/22.

Government of Nepal. (1964). Land Act. Nepal Law Commission, Kathmandu.

Government of Nepal. (2017). Local Government Operation Act (2017). Nepal Law Commission, Kathmandu.

Government of Nepal. (2017). National Irrigation Policy (2014). Ministry of Irrigation and Water Resources, Kathmandu.

Government of Nepal. (2019). Climate Change Policy of Nepal (2019). Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu.

Government of Nepal. (2016). Nepal Trade Integration Strategy (NTIS). Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development, Government of Nepal.

Government of Nepal. (2024). Food Hygiene and Quality Act. Nepal Law Commission, Kathmandu.

Grindle, M. S. (2017). Politics and policy implementation in the developing world. Harvard University Press.

High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE). (2017). Nutrition and food systems. FAO.

Khanal, N. R., Nepal, P., Zhang, Y., Nepal, G., Paudel, B., Liu, L., & Rai, R. (2020). Policy provisions for agricultural development in Nepal: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261, 121241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121241.

Mockshell J; Resnick D; Omulo G; Blanco M; Nicol A. (2023). Political Economy and Policy Analysis (PEPA) Sourcebook: A Guide to Generating Evidence for National Policies and Strategies (NPS) for Food, Land, and Water Systems Transformation. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia, and International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington DC, USA. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/132050.

MSNP (Multi-Sector Nutrition Plan III) (2023–2030). Government of Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission) (1956). The First Periodic Plan (1956-61). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission) (1962). The Second Periodic Plan (1962-65). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission), (1965). The Third Periodic Plan ((1965-70). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission), (1970). The Fourth Periodic Plan (1970-75). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission), (1975). The Fifth Periodic Plan (1975-80). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission), (1980). The Sixth Periodic Plan (1980-85). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission), (1985). The Seventh Periodic Plan (1985-90). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission), (1992). The Eighth Periodic Plan (1992-97). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission), (1997). The Ninth Periodic Plan (1997-2002). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission), (2002). The Tenth Periodic Plan (2002-2007). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission), (2007). The Three-Year Interim Plan (2007/08–2009/10). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission), (2010). The Twelfth Periodic Plan (2010/11-2012/13)). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission), (2013). The Thirteenth Periodic Plan (2013/14-2015/16). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission), (2017). The Fourteenth Periodic Plan (2016/17-2018/19). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission), (2019). The Fifteenth Periodic Plan (2019/20 –2023/24). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NPC (National Planning Commission), (2024). The Sixteenth Periodic Plan (2024/25–2028/29). Kathmandu, Nepal.

NFNSP (National Food and Nutrition Security Policy) (2023). Government of Nepal.

Nepal Rastra Bank. (2023). Current Macroeconomic and Financial Situation of Nepal (Based on Annual Data of 2022/23). Economic Research Department, Baluwatar, Kathmandu.

Oskam, A., Meester, G., & Silvis, H., (2010). EU policy for agriculture, food and rural areas. Wageningen. Academic Publishers, Wageningen.

Sidibe, A., Edmond, T., Mary, T.H., Oumar, T. T., Pierre C. S.T., & Laura S. O. (2018). Multi-scale Governance in agriculture systems: Interplay between national and local institutions around the Production dimension of food security in Mali. NJAS – Wag. J. of Life Sci. 84, 94–102.

Timmer, C. P. (1991). Food price stabilization: The political economy of agriculture. Food Policy, 16(3), 241–252.

Timmer, C. P. (1988). The agricultural transformation. In H. Chenery & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of Development Economics (Vol. 1, pp. 275–331). Elsevier.

Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

Haque, M. E., Abdullah, M. R., Chanda, S. C., Haque, M. S., Sarwar, A. G., Talukder, M. A.-A. H., … Hossain, A. Z. (2026). Screening and evaluation of sorghum germplasm for salinity tolerance using physiological indices in hydroponic culture. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 11(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2026.110202

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.