Impact of varying water-logging durations at various stages of growth on mustard seed yield
Abstract
Waterlogging significantly affects agricultural growth and development, making it a severe constraint limiting crop production and quality. This study aims to assess the level of water tolerance of standard mustard cultivars while taking into account the influence of varied water-logging durations on mustard seed output. In this study, a randomized complete block design was used to examine the effects of water-logging on the various phases of various mustard varieties under ambient temperature and sunshine circumstances. Binasarisha-9, Binasarisha-11 and BARI Sarisha-14 were the varieties utilized in the experiment, and water-logging treatments were applied at different times of 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours at 55–60 days after sowing (DAS). Data on plant height, branches plant-1, and siliquae plant-1 were taken from 10 randomly selected plants from each plot. The maturity period was counted when 90% of siliquae matured. The seed yield of each plot was recorded after harvest. The result shows that the highest seed yield (1.51t ha-1) was found for Binasarisha-11 under water-logging conditions for 24 hours at 55-60 DAS and almost the same result on seed yield (1.46t ha-1) for Binasarisha-9 was found for the same treatment. Moderate yield at 48 hours water logging was observed whereas there was significant yield reduction for 72 hours water logging. BARI Sarisha-14, Binasarisha-9, and Binasarisha-11 yielded 4.5%, 1.38%, and 11.56% less than non-water-logged situations after 72 hours of water-logging at 55-60 DAS. However, it could be concluded that these results provide valuable insights into the effects of waterlogging on seed yield and can aid in selecting suitable mustard genotypes in flood-prone environments to mitigate the negative effects of climate change.
Keywords:
Growth stages, Mustard, Seed yield, Water-loggingDownloads
References
Ali, M. H. (2018). Effect of different durations of water-logging at different growth stages on seed yield of sesame. International Journal of Applied Science, 1(2), p68-p68.
Anderson, S. H., Gantzer, C. J., & Brown, J. R. (1990). Soil physical properties after 100 years of continuous cultivation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 45(1), 117-121.
Ashraf, M., & Mehmood, S. (1990). Effects of waterlogging on growth and some physiological parameters of four Brassica species. Plant and Soil, 121, 203-209.
Bradford, K. J., & Hsiao, T. C. (1982). Stomatal behavior and water relations of waterlogged tomato plants. Plant Physiology, 70(5), 1508-1513.
Cubasch, U., Meehl, G. A., Boer, G. J., Stouffer, R. J., Dix, M., Noda, A., & Yap, K. S. (2001). Projections of future climate change. In Climate Change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of WG1 to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC (TAR) (pp. 525-582). Cambridge University Press.
Drew, M. C. (1997). Oxygen deficiency and root metabolism: injury and acclimation under hypoxia and anoxia. Annual review of plant biology, 48(1), 223-250.
Eid, E.M. Kumar, P., Bashir, B., Choi, K.S., Singh, J., Kumari, S., & Kumar, V. (2021). Modeling of mineral elements uptake and localization in cabbage inflorescence (Brassica oleracea var.) grown on sugar mill pressmud amended soils. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(9), 586, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09381-8
FRG. (2018). Fertilizer Recommendation Guide. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, BARC. Farmgate, 1215, 89.
Geigenberger, P. (2003). Response of plant metabolism to too little oxygen. Current opinion in plant biology, 6(3), 247-256.
Kaur, G., Zurweller, B. A., Nelson, K. A., Motavalli, P. P., & Dudenhoeffer, C. J. (2017). Soil waterlogging and nitrogen fertilizer management effects on corn and soybean yields. Agronomy Journal, 109(1), 97-106.
Kumar, V., & Chopra, A.K. (2014). Ferti-irrigational response of hybrid cultivar of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) to distillery effluent in two seasons. Analytical Chemistry Letters, 4(3), 190-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/22297928.2014.969616
Ogbolumani, O. A., & Nwulu, N. I. (2022). A food-energy-water nexus meta-model for food and energy security. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 438-453.
Olorunwa, O. J., Adhikari, B., Brazel, S., Bheemanahalli, R., Barickman, T. C., & Reddy, K. R. (2023). Waterlogging stress reduces cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) genotypes growth, seed yield, and quality at different growth stages: implications for developing tolerant cultivars under field conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 284, 108336.
Rashid, M.M., MM, M., & MA, H. (2010). Growth parameters of different mustard (Brassica campestris L) varieties as effected by different levels of fertilizers. Bulletin of the Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kyushu University, 33(1), 73-81.
Ritter, W., & Beer, C. (1969). Yield Reduction from Controlle Flooding of Corn.
Sinha, B. K., Chhabra, M. L., & Tiku, A. K. (2011). Effect of water logging and high temperature at various stages of development on growth and yield parameters of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss.). The Journal of Plant Science Research, 27(2), 169.
Wang, L., Li, D., Zhang, Y., Gao, Y., Yu, J., Wei, X., & Zhang, X. (2016). Tolerant and susceptible sesame genotypes reveal waterlogging stress response patterns. PloS one, 11(3), e0149912.
Zaidi, P. H., Rafique, S., Rai, P. K., Singh, N. N., & Srinivasan, G. (2004). Tolerance to excess moisture in maize (Zea mays L.): susceptible crop stages and identification of tolerant genotypes. Field Crops Research, 90(2-3), 189-202.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Agriculture and Environmental Science Academy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.