Scalability constraints in Disruptive Agricultural Technologies (DATs) along Value Chain on agricultural production in South Sudan

David Lomeling 1

1   Department of Agricultural Sciences, College of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies (CNRES), University of Juba, P.O. Box 82 Juba, South SUDAN

✉ Coressponding author: See PDF.

doi https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2021.0603021

doi

Abstract

Scalability known as the capacity of input variables along the Value Chain (VC) to effect transformative changes on agricultural production was evaluated for a farming system in Juba County of Central Equatoria State (CES), South Sudan. These transformative input variables commonly referred to as, Disruptive Agricultural Technologies (DATs) in the form of advisory, material as well as technological variables were shown to positively influence agricultural production from a default state. The objective of this study was to find out how a probability-based Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) software NETICA could be applied to assess as well as upscale the level of agricultural production P(Prodlevel |    ) from a data input domain D. Simulation using a 700 kg ha-1 of cowpea yield at 50% Cumulative Probability Distribution (CPD) as a calibrant, the backcasting method showed that, scaling up of marginal probabilities in agrotechnology and financial resources from 0.025 to 0.1 (25% increment) and from 0.015 to 0.03 (50% increment) respectively, while keeping other input variables unchanged, increased cowpea yield from 692.9 to 783.1 kg ha-1 (about 12% increment).  Conversely, where no DATs were introduced as in the worst-case scenario, production level was comparatively lower. The BBN model is thus, an indispensable tool that can provide useful information on scaling up agricultural production and hence improve livelihood opportunities in Juba County. However, for sustainable agricultural production, scalability may be constrained by spatial-temporal, environmental and socio-economic imperatives as well as on availability, accessibility, affordability of all input variables.

Keywords:

Backcasting, Bayesian Belief Network, Conditional Probabilities, Disruptive Agricultural Technologies, Input variables

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, K. (2001). Reconciling the electricity industry with sustainable development: backcasting – a strategic alternative. Futures, 33, 607–623.

Attipoe, F. Y., Blay Jnr, J., Agyakwah, S., Ponzoni, R. W., Khaw, H. L., & Abban, E. K. (2013, October). Genetic parameters and response to selection in the development of Akosombo strain of the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in the Volta Basin, Ghana. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture, Jerusalem, Palestine (pp. 6-10).

Benfica, R., Boughton, D., Mouzinho, B., & Uaiene, R. (2014). Food Crop Marketing and Agricultural Productivity in a High Price Environment: Evidence and Implications for Mozambique. Research Paper 76E, Directorate of Economics, Ministry of Agriculture, Mozambique.

Bicking, S., Burkhard, B., Kruse, M., & Müller, F. (2019). Bayesian Belief Network-based assessment of nutrient regulating ecosystem services in Northern Germany. PLoS ONE, 14(4), e0216053, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216053

Bonilla, C. C., Chamberlin, J., Guo, Z., & Hijmans, R. J. (2020). Spatial variation in fertilizer prices in Sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE 15(1), e0227764, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0227764

Clesensio, T., & George L. L. L. (2011). Post-conflict Development of Agriculture in South Sudan: Perspective on Approaches to Capacity Strengthening -Unpublished Report 22p.

Cooper, G., & Herskovitz, E. (1992). A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Machine Learning, 9, 309-347.

David, R. K., Marie-Hélène, S., Walter, E. B., José, E. B., Miguel, C., Achim, D., Bruno, F., Bruno, L., Mario, M., Cecilia, P., Rodrigo, S., María, E. S., & Juan, M. S. L. (2016). Translating the Sustainable Development Goals into action: A participatory backcasting approach for developing national agricultural transformation pathways. Global Food Security, 10, 71–79, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.08.002

Diao, X., Liangzhi Y., Vida, A., & Renato, F. (2012). Assessing Agricultural Potential in South Sudan – A Spatial Analysis Method. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington DC, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/47938

Forioa, M. A. E., Landuyt, D., Bennetsena, E., Locka, K., Nguyena, T. H. T., Ambarita, M. N. D., Musongea, P. L. S., Boets, P., Everaert, G., Grandac, L. D., & Goethals, P. L. M. (2015). Bayesian belief network models to analyse and predict ecological water quality in rivers. Ecological Modelling, 312, 222-238, http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.025

Heckerman, D., Geiger, D., & Chickering, D. (1995). Learning Bayesian networks: combination of knowledge and statistical data. Machine Learning, 20, 197–243.

IPC (2020) Source. Technical Manual, Version 1.1. http://www.fao.org/3/i0275e/i0275e.pdf

Jouanjean, M. A. (2019). Digital Opportunities for Trade in the Agriculture and Food Sectors. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 122, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Kanter, D. R., Schwoob, M. H., Baethgen, W. E., Bervejillo, J. E., Carriquiry, M., Dobermann, A., ... & de Lima, J. M. S. (2016). Translating the sustainable development goals into action: a participatory backcasting approach for developing national agricultural transformation pathways. Global Food Security, 10, 71-79.

Kok, K., van Vliet, M., Bärlund, I., Dubel, A., & Sendzimir, J. (2011). Combining participative backcasting and exploratory scenario development: Experiences from the SCENES project. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(5), 835–851, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.004

Krishnan, A., Banga, K., & Mendez-Parra, M. (2020). Disruptive technologies in agricultural value chains. Insights from East Africa. Working Paper 576, ODI, London.

Lomeling, D. (2015). Spatial Distribution of Food Poverty Incidence in Juba Town. A geostatistical Assessment. Journal of Food Security, 3(1), 11-24, http://doi.org/10.12691/jfs-3-1-3

Lomeling, D., & Huria S. J. (2020). Using the DSSAT-CROPGRO model to simulate gross margin and N-leaching of cowpea fertigated with human urine. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 5(1), 1-10, http://doi.org/ 10.26832/24566632.2020.050101.

Matthew J. S. (2018). Getting value from artificial intelligence in agriculture. Animal Production Science, 60(1), 46-54, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN18522

Mulder H., & Biesiot W. (1998). Transition to a Sustainable Society – A Backcasting Approach to Modelling Energy and Ecology. Ed: Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

Olympio A., Biplove C., & Nicholas J. (2014). An analysis of Government Budgets in South Sudan from a human development perspective Discussion Paper 08/2014, UNDP South Sudan.

Pachico, D., & Fujisaka, S. (2004). Scaling Up and Out: Achieving Widespread Impact Through Agricultural Research. CIAT Publication No. 340, pp 293.

Poppe, K. J., Wolfert, S., Verdouw, C., & Verwaart, T. (2013). Information and communication technology as a driver for change in agri-food chains. Euro Choices 12, 60-65.

Price, C. S., Moodley, D., & Pillay, A.,W. (2018). Dynamic Bayesian decision network to represent growers' adaptive pre-harvest burning decisions in a sugarcane supply chain. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, SAICSIT´18, pp 89–98, https://doi.org/10.1145/3278681.3278693

Rabbi, Md., Ali, S. M., Kabir, G., Mahtab, Z., & Paul, S. K. (2020). Green Supply Chain Performance Prediction Using a Bayesian Belief Network. Sustainability, 12, (3), 1-19, http://doi.org/10.3390/su12031101

Robinson J., Burch S., Talwar S., O'Shea M., & Walsh M. (2011). Envisioning sustainability: Recent progress in the use of participatory backcasting approaches for sustainability research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(5), 756–768, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.12.006

Rotz, S., Duncan, E., Small, M., Botschner, J., Dara, R., Mosby, I., Reed, M., & Fraser, E. D. G. (2019). The politics of digital agricultural technologies: a preliminary review. Sociology Ruralis, 59, 203-229.

Scanagatta, M., Corani, G., de Campos, C.P., & Zaffalon, M. (2018). Approximate structure learning for large Bayesian networks. Machine Learning, 107, 1209–1227, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-018-5701-9

Scanagatta, M., Salmerón, A., & Stella, F. (2019). A survey on Bayesian network structure learning from data. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13748-019-00194-y

Sharma S. K., & Sharma S. (2015). Developing a Bayesian Network Model for Supply Chain Risk Assessment, Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 16(4), 50-72, http://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2015.11728693

Trendov, N. M., Varas, S., & Zenf, M. (2019). Digital Technologies in Agriculture and Rural Areas: Status Report, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-south-sudan.

Woltering, L., Fehlenberg, K., Gerard, B., Ubels, J., & Cooley, L. (2019). Scaling – from “reaching many” to sustainable systems change at scale: A critical shift in mindset. Agricultural Systems, 176, 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102652

World Bank: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/southsudan/overview. Accessed on 02.04.2021.

Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Zhang, Q., Yan, C., & Xu, S. (2020). A Bayesian network model for the reliability control of fresh food e-commerce logistics systems. Soft Computing, 24, 6499–6519, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04666-5

Published

2021-09-25

How to Cite

Lomeling, D. (2021). Scalability constraints in Disruptive Agricultural Technologies (DATs) along Value Chain on agricultural production in South Sudan . Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 6(3), 397-407. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2021.0603021