Changes in growth parameters and forage quantity and quality of corn harvested at different developmental stages

Suleyman CAGIR 1 , Yakup Onur KOCA 2

1   Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, Izmir, TURKEY
2   Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Aydin, TURKEY

✉ Coressponding author: See PDF.

doi https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2021.060407

doi

Abstract

Due to the different agricultural practices such as second cropping or more for the increase product obtained from the areas of suitable climate, some differences in harvesting stages of plants have been occurred. The study was carried out in the Menemem location of Izmir in the coastal Aegean region of Turkey under Mediterranean climate in 2018 and 2019 to determine the performance of corn cultivars in different maturity stages. Seven varieties of corn (Everest, Aga, Kilowatt, Burak, Samada-07, P30B74 and P31Y43) were harvested at 3 different growth stages (silking, end of milk and dough stages) to determine the changes in some parameters of growing, forage quantity and quality. The highest average of dry forage yield (24159 kg ha-1 average of years) was determined at the third harvest date. The maximum cob rate was also measured at the third harvest date, but the maximum leaf and stalk rates were measured at the first harvest date. The average protein rate decreased throughout the growing period while ADF and NDF increased. Almost all of the varieties were found to have large leaf areas. The Burak variety came to the fore due to its long length and relatively thick stalk features and high green and dry yields. Moreover, P31Y43 was determined to have a high quality in addition to high green and dry grass yields. Therefore, the Burak and P31Y43 can be suggested in terms of high parameters both quantity and quality under different crop conditions for increase production.

Keywords:

ADF, Corn, Dough stage, LAI, Milk stage, NDF, Protein, RGR, Silking

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous (2019). FAO’s Data. Source: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/TP, (Accessed June 30, 2021).

Birch, J. C., Vos, J., & Van Der Putten, P. E. L. (2003). Plant development and leaf area production in contrasting cultivars of maize grown in a cool temperature environment in the field. European Journal Agronomy, 19, 173-188.

Caetano, H., Oliveira, M. D. S., Freitas Júnior, J. E., Rêgo, A. C., Carvalho, M. V., & Rennó, F. P. (2011). Nutritional characteristics and in vitro digestibility of silages from different corn cultivars harvested at two cutting heights. Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 40(4), 708-714.

Charmley, E. (2001). Towards improved silage quality – a review. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 81, 157–168.

Chia, S., Tanga, C. M., vanLoon, J. J. A., & Dicke, M. (2019). Insects for sustainable animal feed: inclusive business models involving smallholder farmers. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 41, 23-30.

Colomb, B., Kiniry, J. R., & Debaeke, P. (2000). Effect of soil phosphorus on leaf development and senescence dynamics of field-grown maize. Agronomy Journal, 92, 428–435.

Dahiya, S., Kumar, S., Chaudhary, H., & Chaudhary, C. (2018). Lodging: significance and preventive measures for increasing crop production. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6(1), 700-705.

Demira, Z., Keçeci, M., & Tunç, A.E. (2021). Effects of nitrogen fertigation on yield, quality components, water use efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency of silage maize (Zea mays L.) as the second crop. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 44(3), 373–394.

Elleby, C., Domínguez, I. P., Adenauer, M., & Genovese, G. (2020). Impacts of the covid 19 pandemic on the global agricultural markets. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76, 1067–1079.

Ferreira, G., & Teets, C. L. (2017). Effect of planting density on yield, nutritional quality, and ruminal in vitro digestibility of corn for silage grown under

on-farm conditions. The Professional Animal Scientist, 33, 420–425.

Geren, H. (2014). Dry matter yield and silage quality of some winter cereals harvested at different stages under Mediterranean climate conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 19(2), 197-202.

Gislum, R., Micklander, E., & Nielsen, J.P. (2004). Quantification of nitrogen concentration in perennial ryegrass and red fescue using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) and chemometrics. Field Crops Research, 88, 269-277.

Goergen, P. C. H., Lago, I., Durigon, A., Roth, G. F. M., Scheffel, L. G., & Slim, T. (2019). Performance of chia on different sowing dates: characteristics of growth rate, leaf area index, shoot dry matter partitioning and grain yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, 11(9), 252-263.

Goergen, P. C. H., Nunes, U.R., Stefanello, R., Lago, I., Nunes, A. R., & Durigon, A. (2018). Yield and physical and physiological quality of salvia hispanica l. Seeds grown at different sowing dates. Journal of Agricultural Science, 10(8), 182-191.

Hunt, R., Causton, D. R., Shipley, B., & Askew, A. P. (2002). A modern tool for classical plant growth analysis. Annals of Botany, 90, 485-488.

Ilker, E. (2011). Correlation and path coefficient analyses in sweet corn. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 16(2), 105-107.

Keles, G. & Cıbık, M. (2014). Factors affecting the nutritional and nutritional value of corn silage. Journal of Animal Production, 55(2), 27-37.

Koca, Y. O. & Erekul, O. (2016). Changes of dry matter, biomass and relative growth rate with different phenological stages of corn. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 10, 67–75.

Koca, Y. O. (2009). Differences between yield, yield components, physiological and some other characteristics in first and second crop maize (Zea mays) in Aydın region. PhD Thesis, Adnan Menderes University, Institute of Sciences, pp. 135.

Konuskan, O., & Kilinc, C. (2019). Effect of plant density on growth and grain yield of some hybrid corn (Zea mays L.) varieties under mediterranean environment. Fresenius Enviromental Bulletin, 28(4), 2795-2801.

Kusaksız, T. (2010). Adaptability of some new maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars for silage production as main crop in Mediterranean environment. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 15(2), 193-197.

Loecke, T. D., Liebman, M., Cambardella, C. A., & Richard, T. L. (2004). Corn growth responses to composted and fresh solid swine manures. Crop Science, 44, 177-184.

Maddoni, G. A. & Otegui, M. E. (1996). Leaf area, light interception and crop development in maize. Field Crops Research, 48, 81-87.

Mahmud, A., & Rahouma, A. (2021). Effect of plant density on silage yield and quality of some maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal, 42(1), 89-94.

Odegard, I. & van der Voet, E. (2014). The future of food—scenarios and the effect on natural resource use in agriculture in 2050. Ecological Economics, 97, 51-59.

Oliveira, I. L., Lima, L.M., Casagrande, D. R., André, M., Lara, S., & Bernardes, T. F. (2017). Nutritive value of corn silage from intensive dairy farms in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science, 46(6), 494-501.

Onal Ascı, O. & Acar, Z. (2018). Quality of Forage. TMMOB Chamber of Agricultural Engineers Publications. ISBN978-605-01-1227-6.

Perry, L. J. & Compton, W. A. (1977). Serial measures of dry matter accumulation and forage quality of leaves, stalks and ear of three corn hybrids. Agronomy Journal, 69, 751-755.

Popović, V., Kolarić, L., Živanović, L., Ikanović, J., Rajičić, V., Dozet, G., & Stevanović, P. (2018). Influence of row spacing on nar–net photosynthesis productivity of Glycine max (L.) merrill. Agriculture & Forestry, 64(1), 159-169.

Powell, J. M., MacLeod, M., Vellinga, T. V., Opio, C., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G., Steinfeld, H., & Gerber, P. (2013). Feed-milk-manure nitrogen relationships in global dairy production systems. Livestock Science, 152, 261–272.

Siddque, M. A. B., Sarker, N. R., Hamid, M. A., Amin, M. N., & Sultana, M. (2015). Growth performance, feed conversion ratio and economics of production of native and crossbred (local×holstein friesian) bulls for fattening under different improved feeding. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 5, 770–780.

Singh, A. K., Singh, B., Jeet, A., & Prasad, G. (2020). Influence of sowing times, seed rates and row spacings on physiological studies of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(2), 510-513.

South, D. B. (1995). Relative growth rates: a critique. South African Forestry Journal, 173, 43–48.

Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. Second Edition, Mc. Graw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York.

Tas, T. (2020). Determination of silage characteristics and nutritional values of some silage corn varieties in second crop conditions. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 29, 7697-7705.

Vinnari, M. & Tapio, P. (2009). Future images of meat consumption in 2030, Futures, 41, 269–278.

Published

2021-12-25

How to Cite

CAGIR, S., & KOCA, Y. O. (2021). Changes in growth parameters and forage quantity and quality of corn harvested at different developmental stages. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 6(4), 459-468. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2021.060407

Issue

Section

Research Articles