Effect of unseasonal rainfall on rice production in Nepal during the year 2021: A case study

Santoshi Malla 1 , Lal Bista 2 , Uttam Rosyara 3 , Birat Sapkota 4

1   Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science College, Gokuleshwor College, Tribhuvan University, Baitadi, NEPAL
2   Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science College, Gokuleshwor College, Tribhuvan University, Baitadi, NEPAL
3   Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science College, Gokuleshwor College, Tribhuvan University, Baitadi, NEPAL
4   Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science College, Gokuleshwor College, Tribhuvan University, Baitadi, NEPAL

✉ Coressponding author: See PDF.

doi https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2022.0702020

doi

Abstract

Our study explicit the information regarding the status losses and the compensation amount We browsed the website of Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development (MoALD) and visited Agriculture Knowledge Centre to obtain the information. Rice is a major cereal crop, contributing around 25% of GDP and majority of working population are engaged in rice production for at least half year. Increasing population and pernicious natural hazards had
declined the rice production leading to increment in import of rice from neighboring countries. Nepal received 15% more rain than average monsoon in year 2021.  Flooding in various areas of Nepal occurred, causing huge loss of rice production along with destruction of lives and property indirectly leading to food insecurity. The onset of heavy unseasonal monsoon, occurred at the period when rice crops were ready to harvest or ready to thresh, undermined the labor, time and money invested by the farmers. The total rice production has been reduced to 5.13 million tons in 2021 from 5.55 million tons in 2020 at the rate of 8.74%. Lumbini Province faced the highest loss, followed by Sudarpaschim Province of Nepal. Climate change was the major factor responsible for this, hampering the agricultural productivity. Government of Nepal had decided to provide compensation to them based on three categories: small farmers having holdings of up to 10 katthas received compensation of 65% of their cost of production ,  medium farmers having land holdings from 11 to 40 katthas received 30% of their cost of production ,the large farmers having land holdings more than 40 katthas received compensation 20% of their cost of production. Also, the partially affected farmers received compensation 20% of their cost of production.

Keywords:

Climate change, Compensation, Food insecurity, Import, Unseasonal rainfall

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alam, M. M., Siwar, C., Murad, M. W., & Toriman, M. E. (2011). Farm level assessment of climate change, agriculture and food security issues in

Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 14(3), 431-442.

Auffhammer, M., Ramanathan, V., & Vincent, J. R. (2012). Climate change, the monsoon, and rice yield in India. Climatic Change, 111(2), 411-424.

Awoderu, V. A., & Bangura, N. S. (1992). Reduction in Grain Yield Attributable to Neckblast (Pyricuhria oryzae) Infection in Liberia. Journal of Phytopathology, 134(1), 17-21.

Cancelliere, A., Mauro, G. D., Bonaccorso, B., & Rossi, G. (2007). Drought forecasting using the standardized precipitation index. Water Resources Management, 21(5), 801-819.

Dasgupta, S., Hossain, M., Huq, M., & Wheeler, D. (2015). Climate change and soil salinity: The case of coastal Bangladesh. Ambio, 44(8), 815-826.

Fisher, M., Abate, T., Lunduka, R. W., Asnake, W., Alemayehu, Y., & Madulu, R. B. (2015). Drought tolerant maize for farmer adaptation to drought in sub-Saharan Africa: Determinants of adoption in eastern and southern Africa. Climatic Change, 133(2), 283-299.

Glas, H., Deruyter, G., De Maeyer, P., Mandal, A., & James-Williamson, S. (2016). Analyzing the sensitivity of a flood risk assessment model towards its input data. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 16(12), 2529-2542.

Goudappa, S. B., Reddy, B. S., & Chandrashekhar, S. M. (2012). Farmers perception and awareness about crop insurance in Karnataka. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 2, 218-222.

Hasegawa, R., Tamura, M., Kuwahara, Y., Yokoki, H., & Mimura, N. (2009, July). An Input-output Analysis for Economic Losses of Flood Caused by Global Warming-A Case Study of Japan at the River Basin’s Level. In Proceedings of the International Input-output Conference, Sao Paulo, Brazil (pp. 13-17).

Khanal, U., Wilson, C., Hoang, V. N., & Lee, B. (2018). Farmers' adaptation to climate change, its determinants and impacts on rice yield in Nepal. Ecological Economics, 144, 139-147.

Le Dang, H., Li, E., Bruwer, J., & Nuberg, I. (2014). Farmers’ perceptions of climate variability and barriers to adaptation: lessons learned from an exploratory study in Vietnam. Mitigation And Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 19(5), 531-548.

MOAD. (2021). Statistical Information on Nepalese Agriculture,2016/17. Ministry of Agricultural Development, Singh Durbar, Kathmandu. Peng, S., Khush, G.S., Virk, P., Tang, Q. and Zou, Y. (2008). Progress in ideotype

(PDF) A review on production status and growing environments of rice in Nepal and in the world. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331641330_A_review_on_production_status_and_growing_environments_of_rice_in_Nepal_and_in_the_world [accessed May 01 2022].

Mall, R. K., & Aggarwal, P. K. (2002). Climate change and rice yields in diverse agro-environments of India. I. Evaluation of impact assessment models. Climatic Change, 52(3), 315-330.

Miah, G., Bari, N., & Rahman, A. (2010). Resource degradation and livelihood in the coastal region of Bangladesh. Frontiers of Earth Science in China, 4(4),

-437.

Nagabhatla, N., Beveridge, M., Mahfuzul Haque, A. B. M., Nguyen-Khoa, S., & Van Brakel, M. (2012). Multiple water uses as an approach for increased basin productivity and improved adaptation: a case study from Bangladesh. International journal of river basin management, 10(1), 121-136.

Rahman, M. A., Kang, S., Nagabhatla, N., & Macnee, R. (2017). Impacts of temperature and rainfall variation on rice productivity in major ecosystems of Bangladesh. Agriculture & Food Security, 6(1), 1-11.

Revi, A. (2008). Climate change risk: an adaptation and mitigation agenda for Indian cities. Environment and Urbanization, 20(1), 207-229.

Sharma, S. (2017). Impacts of the Gorkha earthquake 2015 on the Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla Linnaeus, 1758) in Chautara Municipality of Sindhupalchowk, Nepal (Doctoral dissertation, Central Department of Zoology Institute of Science and Technology Tribhuvan University Kirtipur, Kathmandu).

Shrestha, B. B., Okazumi, T., Miyamoto, M., & Sawano, H. (2016). Flood damage assessment in the P ampanga river basin of the Philippines. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 9(4), 355-369.

Thapa, S., Shrestha, A., Lamichhane, S., Adhikari, R., & Gautam, D. (2020). Catchment-scale flood hazard mapping and flood vulnerability analysis of residential buildings: The case of Khando River in eastern Nepal. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 30, 100704.

Venkatachalam, L. (2005). Damage assessment and compensation to farmers: lessons from verdict of loss of ecology authority in Tamil Nadu. Economic and Political Weekly, 1556-1560.

Win, S., Zin, W. W., & Kawasaki, A. (2020). Development of flood damage estimation model for agriculture–case study in the Bago floodplain,

Myanmar. Journal of Disaster Research, 15(3), 242-255.

Win, S., Zin, W. W., Kawasaki, A., & San, Z. M. L. T. (2018). Establishment of flood damage function models: A case study in the Bago River Basin,

Myanmar. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 28, 688-700.

Zabret, K., Hozjan, U., Kryžanowsky, A., Brilly, M., & Vidmar, A. (2018). Development of model for the estimation of direct flood damage including the movable property. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11, S527-S540.

Published

2022-06-25

How to Cite

Malla, S., Bista, L., Rosyara, U., & Sapkota, B. (2022). Effect of unseasonal rainfall on rice production in Nepal during the year 2021: A case study. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 7(2), 294-299. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2022.0702020

Issue

Section

Case Studies