Assessment of agricultural mechanization status in rice production and its challenges in the western Nepal

Sagar Bhandari 1 , Sarita Bhandari 2 , Sanat K.C. 3 , Ramita Badu 4 , Pankaj Raj Dhital 5 , Aditya Khanal 6

1   Faculty of Agriculture, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, NEPAL
2   Faculty of Agriculture, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, NEPAL
3   Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Paklihawa, NEPAL
4   Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Paklihawa, NEPAL
5   Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Sociology, Agriculture and Forestry University, NEPAL
6   Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Tennessee State University, USA

✉ Coressponding author: See PDF.

doi https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2023.0802021

doi

Abstract

There is a difference of 45% to 55% between the attainable yield and the potential yield of rice. This gap may be due to insufficient inputs and poor mechanization status. In this regard, agricultural mechanization is of the utmost importance to obtain satisfactory yield. This study was conducted to determine mechanization level, power per unit area, probit regression, and challenges faced by farmers to understand the mechanization status in rice cultivation. For this, 98 households in the Pyuthan municipality of Pyuthan district and 87 households in the Bhimdutta municipality of Kanchanpur district were selected using a simple random sampling method. The highest mechanization level was found in the main field tillage (90.92%), followed by threshing (85.24%), the seedbed tillage (52.42%), and irrigation (20.10%). Mechanization is lacking in transplantation, bund preparation, fertilizer application, weeding, and harvesting. Power per unit area was found to be 4.67 hp/ha. Age and family size have a negative impact while male household heads have a positive impact on mechanized tillage and threshing, both statistically significant at a 5% level. The unavailability of farm machinery and land fragmentation were the major challenges in the adoption of farm mechanization. The mechanization status in the study areas is not satisfactory, thus, the strict policy against land fragmentation, dissemination of extension services at the grass root level, and the provision of subsidies for required farm machinery could help the improvement of mechanization status in rice production in Nepal.

Keywords:

Challenges, Land fragmentation, Mechanization level, Power tiller, Probit regression

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aryal, J. P., Thapa, G., & Simtowe, F. (2021). Mechanisation of small-scale farms in South Asia: Empirical evidence derived from farm households survey. Technology in Society, 65, 101591.

Baran, M.F., Gökdoğan, O., & Durgut, M.R. (2014). Batı Marmara Bölgesi’ninTarımsalMekanizasyonÖzellikleri, TürkTarımveDoğaBilimleriDergisi, 1(4), 561-567.

Benin, S. (2015). Impact of Ghana’s agricultural mechanization services center program. Agricultural Economics, 46, 103-117.

Bidari, S. (2022). Krishi AujarKarkhana is reviving. Online khabar, Retrieved from: https://english.onlinekhabar.com/krishi-aujar-karkhana-revive-plan.html

Biggs, S., & Justice, S. (2015). Rural and Agricultural Mechanization: a History of the Spread of Small Engines in Selected Asian Countries. International Food Policy Research Institute. Discussion paper 01443, Development Strategy and Governance Division.

Emami, M., Almassi, M., Bokhoda, H., & Kalantari, I. (2018). Agricultural mechanization, a key to food security in developing countries: strategy formulating for Iran. Agriculture and Food Security, 7, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-018-0176-2

FBC. (2006). Feasibility Study on Agriculture Mechanization in Terai Region of Nepal. Report submitted to Agricultural Engineering Directorate, Harihar Bhawan, Lalitpur.

Gamlath, R., Gunathilke, H., & Chamara, A. (2018). A Study on the Current Status of Mechanization of Paddy Cultivation in Sri Lanka: Case of Anuradhapura District. In Proceedings of 17th Agricultural Research Symposium, 129,133.

G. C., A, Yeo, J. H., & Ghimire, K. (2019). Determinants of farm mechanization in Nepal. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 7(1), 87-91.

ICAF (Indian Council of Food and Agriculture),(2017). Farm Mechanization: National Round Table Conference. New, Delhi. Retrieved from: http://icfa.org.in/assets/doc/reports/RTC_Farm_Mechanization.pdf

Joshi, K.D.& Upadhaya, S. (2020). The rise of rice in Nepal. Nepali Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nepalitimes.com/banner/the-rise-of-rice-in-nepal/.

Kaur, A. (2017). Agricultural mechanization in Nepal. International food policy research institute. South Asia. Retrieved from: https://southasia.ifpri.info/2017/04/07/agricultural-mechanization-in-nepal/

Khanal, A. P. (2020). Impacts of Agricultural Mechanization: A Case of Palpa district of Nepal. Acta Mechanica Malaysia, 3(1), 16-19.

Khanal, U. (2018). Why are farmers keeping cultivatable lands fallow even though there is food scarcity in Nepal? Food Security, 10, 603–614.

Lak, M. B., & Almassi, M. (2011). An analytical review of parameters and indices affecting decision making in agricultural mechanization. Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2(5), 140-146.

Liu, Q., Wu, X., Ma, J., Chen, B., & Xin, C. (2015). Effects of Delaying Transplanting on Agronomic Traits and Grain Yield of Rice under Mechanical Transplantation Pattern. PLoS One, 10(4).

Liu, Q., Zhou, X., Li, J., & Xin, C. (2017). Effects of seedling age and cultivation density on agronomic characteristics and grain yield of mechanically transplanted rice. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 14072.

MoAD, (2014). Ministry of Agricultural Development. Agriculture Mechanization Promotion Policy 2014, Singhdarbar, Nepal. Retrieved from: http://www.aec-fncci.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Agriculture-Mechanization-policy-2070-final-draft.pdf

MoALD, (2020). Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development. Statistical Information on Nepalese Agriculture 2018/2019.Agri Statistics Section, Monitoring, Evaluation and Statistics Division. Singha Durbar, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Pingali, P. L. (2007). Agricultural mechanization: adoption patterns and economic impact. Handbook of agricultural economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2779-2806. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0072(06)03054-4

Prabakar, C., Devi, K. S., & Selvam, S. (2011). Labour Scarcity-Its immensity and Impact on Agriculture, Agricultural Economics Research Review, 24, 373-380.

Shrestha, S. (2012). Status of agricultural mechanization in Nepal. United Nations Asian and Pacific Center for Agricultural Engineering and Machinery (UNAPCAEM).

UNESCAP (United Nation Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific), (2020). Regional overview of agricultural mechanization. Retrieved from: https://un-csam.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/1.pdf

Published

2023-06-25

How to Cite

Bhandari, S., Bhandari, S., K.C., S., Badu, R., Dhital, P. R., & Khanal, A. (2023). Assessment of agricultural mechanization status in rice production and its challenges in the western Nepal. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 8(2), 236-243. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2023.0802021

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.