Agronomic performance and farmers' preferences of twelve spring rice genotypes under participatory approach at Kailali, Nepal

Nabin Ghimire 1 , Samikshya Pandit 2 , Raksha Sharma 3 , Sima Lamichane 4 , Shreya Tiwari 5 , Badal Subedi 6

1   Local Initiatives for Biodiversity, Research and Development Pokhara, Nepal
2   Local Initiatives for Biodiversity, Research and Development Pokhara, Nepal
3   Faculty of Agriculture, Far Western University, Tikapur, Kailali, Nepal
4   Faculty of Agriculture, Far Western University, Tikapur, Kailali, Nepal
5   Faculty of Agriculture, Far Western University, Tikapur, Kailali, Nepal
6   Faculty of Agriculture, Far Western University, Tikapur, Kailali, Nepal

✉ Coressponding author: See PDF.

doi https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2024.0904022

doi

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to assess the agronomic performance and farmers’ preferences of spring rice genotypes in collaboration with farmers. This experiment was conducted from February to June, 2023 at Khaira, Bhajani Municipality in Farmer’s Field School. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), with three replications, testing twelve rice varieties involving 37 small holder farmers. The individual plot size was 10m × 2m with plant spacing maintained at 20cm × 20cm. The data were analysed using the ANOVA technique in R-Studio software (version 4.0), and Fisher’s Protected LSD test was applied for mean separation. Results revealed that yield and yield attributes along with days to maturity were statistically different among genotypes. Maximum grain yield was found in Chaite-5 (10.75 t/ha) followed by IR16L1831 (10.33 t/ha) which was statistically at par with genotype IR10L118 (10.07 t/ha), while the lowest yields were obtained in Chaite-4 (5.77 t/ha) followed by local check variety Chaini-Local (6.77 t/ha). The findings showed that SVIN-191 (139 days) and Hardinath-5 (138 days) had the highest duration to reach maturity. In contrast, the Chaini-Local variety had the shortest time to maturity, taking only 113 days, while Chaite-4 and IR10L152 required 119 and 122 days, respectively.  On participatory varietal selection, the farmer preference score was found maximum in genotype IR10L152 (0.055) followed by a popular variety Chaite-5 (0.047) which signifies these genotypes have certain traits of farmer preference. Moreover, the preference for the genotype IR10L152 above the high-yielding variety Chaite-5 indicates that the farmers in Kailali took several desirable traits into consideration for rice variety selection rather than just high yield.

Keywords:

Genotypes, Flood-prone, Oryza sativa L., Varietal-evaluation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acharya, S., Ghimire, S., Thapa, R., Bhattarai, P., Chhetri, B. P., & Gautam, B. (2024). Evaluation of Spring Season Local and Improved Rice Genotypes on Growth, Yield, and Yield Attributing Characters in Gorkha District, Nepal. Journal La Lifesci, 5(2), 109-125.

Araus, J. L., Kefauver, S. C., Vergara-Díaz, O., Gracia-Romero, A., Rezzouk, F. Z., Segarra, J., Buchaillot, M. L., Chang-Espino, M., Vatter, T., Sanchez-Bragado, R., Fernandez-Gallego, J. A., Serret, M. D., & Bort, J. (2022). Crop phenotyping in a context of global change: What to measure and how to do it. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 64(2), 592–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13191

Ata-Ul-Karim, S. T., Begum, H., Lopena, V., Borromeo, T., Virk, P., Hernandez, J. E., Gregorio, G. B., Collard, B. C. Y., & Kato, Y. (2022). Genotypic variation of yield-related traits in an irrigated rice breeding program for tropical Asia. Crop and Environment, 1(3), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crope.2022.08.004

Bhatt, R., Adhikari, R. K., Karki, R., Khanal, S., & Rajbhandari, S. (2024). Comparative Economics of Main Season and Spring Rice Production in Kanchanpur District, Nepal.

Chaudhary, B., Bhatt, T. R., & Gyawali, P. (2023). Varietal evaluation of spring rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes in Kanchanpur, Nepal. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 8(4), 504-509.

Choudhary, D., Banskota, K., Khanal, N. P., McDonald, A. J., Krupnik, T. J., &Erenstein, O. (2022). Rice subsector development and farmer efficiency in Nepal: implications for further transformation and food security. Frontiers in Sustainable FoodSystems,5, 740546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.740546

De Santis, G., Ponzini, D., Stentella, R., Gaifami, T., Bussi, B., Caimo-Duc, R., & Ceccarelli, S. (2022). Participatory Evaluation of Rice Varieties for Specific Adaptation to Organic Conditions in Italy. Sustainability, 14(17), 10604.

Demeke, B., Dejene, T., & Abebe, D. (2023). Genetic variability, heritability, and genetic advance of morphological, yield related and quality traits in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes at pawe, northwestern Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 9(1), 2157099. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2022.2157099

Gaballah, M. M., & Abu El-Ezz, A. F. (2019). Genetic behaviour of some rice genotypes under normal and high temperature stress. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal,40(2),370-384. https://doi: 10.21608/ASEJAIQJSAE.2019.40780

Gairhe, S., Gauchan, D., & Timsina, K. P. (2021). Temporal dynamics of rice production and import in Nepal. Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council, 7, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.3126/jnarc.v7i1.36932

Ghimire, S., Chhetri, B. P., & Shrestha, J. (2023). Efficacy of different organic and inorganic nutrient sources on the growth and yield of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Heliyon, 9(11).

Guèye, T. (2016). Participatory Assessment of Promising Rice Lines in Senegal. International Journal of Sciences, 2(06), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.18483/ijsci.1076

Ishaq, M., Hassan, A., Munir, S., Shahzad, A., Anjam, M., Bhutta, M., & Qureshi, M. K. (2021). Effect of heritability, genetic advance and correlation on yield contributing traits in upland cotton. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 27(3), 353-359. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.686698

Islam, M., Pandit, D., Hasanuzzaman, M., Hossain, A., & Farhad, M. (2008). Participatory variety selection for selecting and disseminating farmers-preferred wheat varieties. International Journal of Bio-Resource and Stress Management, 4(5), 13–19.

Jaishi, A., Marahatta, S., & Jha, R.K. (2020). Production economics and technology adoption of spring rice at Eastern Chitwan of Nepal. International Journal of Agronomy, 3(1),13-18.

Khadka, D., Dhakal, K., Teli, M. S., Pokhrel, H., Sharma, P., & Lamichhane, M. (2024). Status of farm mechanization and factor affecting its adoption among the rice (Oryzae sativa) farmers in Sarlahi district, Nepal. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 9(3), 414-421, https://dx.doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2024.090302

Kimani, J. M., Tongoona, P., & Derera, J. (2013). Characterization and selection of upland rice germplasm under low and high soil phosphorous (p) and nitrogen (n) environments. African Journal of Plant Science, 7(8), 351-368.

Li, Z., Shen, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, H., Liu, L., Wang, Z., & Yang, J. (2023). Effects of long-term straw returning on rice yield and soil properties and bacterial community in a rice-wheat rotation system. Field Crops Research, 291, 108800.

Manni, T.B., & Sharma, R. (2023). Assessing the optimal level of NPK fertilizers for enhancing production of spring rice in Kanchanpur Nepal. Big Data in Agriculture, 5(1), 36-42

MoALD. (2021). Statistical information on Nepalese agriculture 2075/2076 (2020/2021) Singha Durbar, Kathmandu. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development, Planning and Development cooperation Coordination Di-vision, Statistics and Analysis Section.

MoALD. (2022). Statistical information on Nepalese agriculture 2076/2077 (2021/2022) Singha Durbar, Kathmandu. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development, Planning and Development

cooperation Coordination Di-vision, Statistics and Analysis Section.

Morales, F., Ancín, M., Fakhet, D., González-Torralba, J., Gámez, A. L., Seminario, A., Soba, D., Ben Mariem, S., Garriga, M., & Aranjuelo, I. (2020). Photosynthetic metabolism under stressful growth conditions as a bases for crop breeding and yield improvement. Plants, 9(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9010088

NRRP. (2020). Nepal Agriculture Research Council, Kathmandu annual Report 2076/77. National Rice Research Program.

Ouyang, Y., Li, X., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Understanding the genetic and molecular constitutions of heterosis for developing hybrid rice. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 49(5), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2022.02.022

Paris, T.R. (2011). Guide to participatory varietal selection for submergence tolerant rice. IRRI.

Puri, P., Marahatta, S., Khanal, B., & Poudel, R. (2021). Assessment of growth and yield performance of different rice genotypes at Banyani, Kanchankawal-6, Jhapa. Acta Scientific Agriculture, 5(4), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.31080/asag.2021.05.0972

Shanmugam, A., Suresh, R., Ramanathan, A., Anandhi, P., & Sassikumar, D. (2023). Unravelling genetic diversity of South Indian rice landraces based on yield and its components. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 14(1), 160-169.

Subedi, S., Sharma, S., Poudel, A., Adhikari, S., & KC, B. (2018). Varietal evaluation and preference analysis of promising spring rice genotypes in Dhamilikuwa, Lamjung, Nepal. Acta Scientific Agriculture, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.17352/ojps.000009

Wang, F., Cheng, F., & Zhang, G. (2007). Difference in grain yield and quality among tillers in rice genotypes differing in tillering Capacity. Rice Science, 14(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1672-6308(07)60019-5

Witcombe, J. R., Joshi, A., Joshi, K. D., & Sthapit, B. R. (1996). Farmer participatory crop improvement. I. Varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Experimental agriculture, 32(4), 445-460.

Yadav, R. P., Pant, K. R., Pandey, D., & Shah, P. (2022). Participatory Variety Selection of Spring Wheat Genotype sunder the farmers field condition. Proceedings of 14th National Outreach Research Workshop, 22 & 23 Feb., 2022, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal

Published

2024-12-25

How to Cite

Ghimire, N., Pandit, S., Sharma, R., Lamichane, S., Tiwari, S., & Subedi, B. (2024). Agronomic performance and farmers’ preferences of twelve spring rice genotypes under participatory approach at Kailali, Nepal. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 9(4), 786-792. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2024.0904022

Issue

Section

Research Articles