Economic analysis of maize production in traditional and mechanized farming systems in Nilkantha Municipality, Dhading, Nepal

Authors

  • Subheksha Shrestha Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur Chitwan, Nepal
  • Promise Shrestha Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur Chitwan, Nepal
  • Bibas Chaulagai Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur Chitwan, Nepal
  • Namuna Khatri Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur Chitwan, Nepal
  • Ranjan Bhattarai Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur Chitwan, Nepal
  • Dinesh Paudel Agriculture and Extension Officer, Ministry of Land Management, Agriculture and Cooperatives, Karnali Province, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2025.1002012

Keywords:

Cost of production, Economic analysis, Farm mechanization, Maize farming, Profitability

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the economic analysis as costs and profitability of maize production in traditional and mechanized farming systems.  For this, a purposive random sampling of 101 maize farmers, comprising 30 using traditional methods and 71 employing mechanized systems was selected for structured household surveys. Cobb-Douglas production function, independent sample t-test, chi-square test, and descriptive statistics was performed using MS Excel and STATA software. Farmers under traditional and mechanized systems produced maize on average on 6.18 and 5.46 ropani, respectively.  In mechanized systems, the mini tiller was the main tool used for the land preparation, while urea and farmyard manure (FYM) were the main suppliers of nutrients.  Weeding was the most expensive operation in maize production. Traditional farming incurred higher costs for land preparation, planting, and plant protection. The net return per ropani was NRs. 1158.98 (8.47$) for traditional farming and NRs. 1597.44 (11.67$) for mechanized farming. The benefit-cost ratios were 1.42 for traditional and 1.57 for mechanized systems, respectively. Although the difference in returns per area between the two systems was not statistically significant, but mechanization effectively reduced production costs and enhanced profitability, representing a viable approach to improving maize farmers' financial circumstances. Cobb-Douglas production function analysis revealed a coefficient sum of 0.756 for traditional systems and 1.248 for mechanized systems, indicating decreasing and increasing returns to scale, respectively. Therefore, adoption of mechanization for maize production is recommended for cost minimization and profit maximization in Dhading district of Nepal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aurangzeb, M., Nigar, S., & Shah, M. K. (2007). Benefit-cost analysis of the maize crop under mechanized and traditional farming systems in the NWFP. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 23(1), 169.

Devkota, K., McDonald, A., Khadka, A., Khadka, L., & Paudel, G. (2015). Decomposing maize yield gaps differentiates entry points for intensification in the rainfed mid-hills of Nepal. Field Crops Research, 179, 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.04.013

Devkota, R., Pandey, P., Karki, T. B., Marahatta, S., & Sah, S. K. (2021). Bridging yield gap of winter maize using improved agronomic management practices. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4(2), 201-210.

Dhakal, S., Sah, S. K., Amgain, L. P., & Dhakal, K. H. (2022). Maize cultivation: present status, major constraints and farmers' perception at Madichaur, Rolpa. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry University, 125-131.

FAO. (2023). World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2023. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/6e04f2b4-82fc-4740-8cd5-9b66f5335239/content

Kandel, S., Poudel, R., Saru, M. T., & Parajuli, T. (2021). Status of farm mechanization and its impact on maize production in Jhapa District, Nepal. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 6(3), 290-294. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2021.060304

Lamichhane, J., Timsina, K. P., RanaBhat, D. B., & Adhikari, S. (2015). Technology adoption analysis of improved maize technology in western hills of Nepal. Journal of Maize Research and Development, 1(1), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.3126/jmrd.v1i1.14252

Manjulatha, G., Sowjanya, B., & Rajanikanth, E. (2021). Comparative Economics of maize cultivation under conventional and mechanization. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 11(12), 113-118. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2021/v11i1230561

MoALD. (2023). Statistical Information on Nepalese Agriculture. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development, Statistics and Analysis Section. https://giwmscdnone.gov.np/media/pdf_upload/MOALD-Statical-Book-Magre-2081-Final_wgfs8ph.pdf

NSO. (2021). National Population and Housing Census 2021. Government of Nepal. https://censusnepal.cbs.gov.np/results/files/result-folder/National%20Report_English.pdf

Pokhrel, S., Dhakal, S. C., & Pandey, S. (2018). Economics of maize seed and grain production in Rolpa. Acta Scientific Agriculture, 2(11), 43-50.

Poudel, U., Kattel, R. R., Gurung, B., Shrestha, S., Paudel, A., & Paudel, A. (2021). Economic analysis of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivation in Gorkha district of Nepal. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 6(4), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2021.0604011

Paudyal, K. R., Ransom, J. K., Rajbhandari, N. P., Adhikari, K., Gerpacio, R. V., & Pingali, P. L. (2001). Maize in Nepal: Production systems, constraints, and priorities for research. Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC) & International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.7652

Pradhan, A., Jayasuriya, H. P., & Mbohwa, C. (2016). Status and potentials of agricultural mechanization in Sunsari District, Nepal. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 32(6), 759-768. https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.32.10763

Prajneshu, G. (2008). Fitting of Cobb-Douglas production functions: revisited. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 21(2), 289-292.

Ransom, J., Poudyal, K., & Adhikari, K. (2003). Adoption of improved maize varieties in the hills of Nepal. Agricultural Economics, 29(3), 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(03)00057-4

Rehman, T., Khan, M. U., Tayyab, M., Akram, M. W., & Faheem, M. (2016). Current status and overview of farm mechanization in Pakistan – A review. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR e-Journal, 18(2), 83-93.

Sapkota, M., Joshi, N., Kattel, R., & Bajracharya, M. (2018). Profitability and resource use efficiency of maize seed production in Palpa district of Nepal. SAARC Journal of Agriculture, 16(1), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v16i1.37431

Shrestha, S. (2012). Status of agricultural mechanization in Nepal. United Nations Asian and Pacific Center for Agricultural Engineering and Machinery (UNAPCAEM). https://www.un-csam.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/np_1.pdf

Singh, R. S., & Sahni, R. K. (2019). Transformation of Indian agriculture through mechanization. Economic Affairs, 64(2), 297-303. https://doi.org/10.30954/0424-2513.2.2019.4

Subedi, S. (2016). A review on important maize diseases and their management in Nepal. Journal of Maize Research and Development, 1(1), 28-52. https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.34292

Thapa, R. (2021). A detail eview on status and prospect of maize production in Nepal. Food and Agri Economics Review, 1(1), 52-56. http://doi.org/10.26480/faer.01.2021.52.56

Timsina, K. P., Ghimire, Y. N., & Lamichhane, J. (2016). Maize production in mid hills of Nepal: from food to feed security. Journal of Maize Research and Development, 2(1), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.3126/jmrd.v2i1.16212

Downloads

Published

2025-06-25

How to Cite

Shrestha, S., Shrestha, P., Chaulagai, B., Khatri, N., Bhattarai, R., & Paudel, D. (2025). Economic analysis of maize production in traditional and mechanized farming systems in Nilkantha Municipality, Dhading, Nepal. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 10(2), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2025.1002012

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.